The Present Controversy on Predestination – F. W. Stellhorn

The Present Controversy on Predestination:

A CONTRIBUTION TO ITS HISTORY AND

PROPER ESTIMATE.

By

PROF. F. W. STELLHORN, D, D.,

of the Evangelical Lutheran Seminary, Columbus, Ohio.

Translated by

REV. R. C H. LENSKI, A. M.

THE PRESENT CONTROVERSY

ON

PREDESTINATION:

A CONTRIBUTION TO ITS HISTORY AND

PROPER ESTIMATE.

  1. Dogmatico-Historical Introduction.
    1. Before The Formula Of Concord.
    2. After The Formula Of Concord.
  2. The Formula Of Concord And The Old Lutheran Dogmaticians.
  3. The Doctrine Of Predestination In The Missouri Synod.
    1. Before The Year 1877.
    2. The Synodical Report Of The Western District For The Year 1877.
    3. The Synodical Report Of The Western District For The Year 1879.
    4. “Altes Und Neues” And “Lehre Und Wehre” Before The General Pastoral Conference At Chicago In The Autumn Of 1890.
    5. The General Pastoral Conference In The Autumn Of 1880.
    6. After The Pastoral Conference In The Autumn Of 1880.
    7. Comparative Summary.
      1. What Is Predestination?
      2. What Has God Regarded In Election?
      3. What Is The Relation Especially Of Faith To Election?
      4. In What Sense Does The Formula Of Concord Speak Of Election?
      5. Is Man’s Conversion And Salvation In Every Sense Independent Of His Conduct?
      6. May We Speak Of Man’s Decision Or “Self-Determination” In Conversion?
      7. What Is The Difference Between The Lutheran And The Reformed Doctrine Of Election?
      8. How Must The Doctrine Of The Dogmaticians Of The Seventeenth Century Be Regarded?
      9. How Is The Doctrine Of Modern Missouri To Be Regarded?
    8. Appendix: An Ally Of Modern Missouri In Germany.
  4. The Doctrine Of Predestination In The Ohio Synod.

*Footnotes are only available on the DOCX.

(F. W. Stellhorn – The Present Controversy.DOCX)